Pontos / Dots

Pontos / Dots

  • D/A Pontos mudou
  • D/A Dots has moved
  • POETRY IS THE REALIZATION OF THE MAGNIFICENCE OF THE ACTUAL

    • 29 Jul 2010
    • 0 comentários/ comments
    •  visualizações/ views
    • Inquisitiveness Poetry Science
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    Img_1289

    Photo: Dennis Engel


    Discover Magazine’s blog has published an interesting piece “On the origin of science writers”, in which prominent science writers explain why they’ve started writing about science. Among these writers are Jonah Lehrer and Steve Silberman, whose texts have been published recently by D/A Magazine.

    Steve Silberman writes:

    I loved language.  Before I was even old enough to talk, my late father taught me to love words by reading James Joyce’s “Ulysses” aloud while carrying me on his shoulders. As an English professor at a state college in New Jersey, he showed generations of inner-city students how to see their own struggles reflected in the travails of Dickens’ textile workers and the crew of Melville’s “Pequod.” […]

    When I was 19, between semesters at Oberlin College,  I spent a summer studying with Ginsberg, William Burroughs, and other writers at Naropa Institute in Boulder, Colorado. In his own way, Ginsberg was a journalist, working for planet Earth. He amassed vast file-cabinets of carefully annotated data on subjects of interest, such as CIA-sponsored heroin trafficking in Southeast Asia. (Those files are now housed in a special collection at Stanford University.) One day in class Ginsberg said, “Poetry is the realization of the magnificence of the actual.” That remark has stuck with me. It could also be said about science.

    Silberman, like most of the other writers, share an inquisitive mind and a fascination by the universe and its challenges ― like most scientists, artists, and most human beings. As Jonah Lehrer reminds us, today we need a movement “that deliberately trespasses on our cultural boundaries and seeks to create relationships between the arts and the sciences. The premise of this movement—perhaps a fourth culture—is that neither culture can exist by itself.”

    Read more on Discover Magazine’s blog.

    • Tweet
  • APPRECIATION: INQUISITIVENESS

    • 25 Jul 2010
    • 0 comentários/ comments
    •  visualizações/ views
    • Appreciation Inquisitiveness Photography
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    Mercurius. Photo installation by Zsolt Sütő


    The purpose of dharma art is to try to overcome aggression. According to the Buddhist vajrayana tradition, if your mind is preoccupied with aggression, you cannot function properly. On the other hand, if your mind is preoccupied with passion, there are possibilities. In fact, artistic talent is somewhat related to the level of passion, or heightened interest in the intriguing qualities of things. Inquisitiveness is precisely the opposite of aggression. You experience inquisitiveness when there’s a sense of wanting to explore every corner and discover every possibility of the situation. You are so intrigued by what you’ve experienced, what you’ve seen, and what you’ve heard that you begin to forget your aggression. At once, your mind is at ease, seduced into greater passion.

    When you are in a passionate state, you begin to like the world, and you begin to be attracted to certain things—which is good. Obviously, such attraction also entails possessiveness and some sense of territoriality, which comes later. But straightforward, pure passion—without ice, without water, without soda—is good. It is drinkable; it is also food; you can live on it. It’s quite marvelous that we have passion, that we are not made purely out of aggression. It’s some kind of saving grace that we possess, which is fantastic. We should be thankful to the Great Eastern Sun vision. Without passion, nothing can be experienced; nothing can be worked on. With aggression, we have bad feelings about ourselves: either we feel tremendously righteous, that we are the only ones who are right, or we feel pissed off that somebody is destroying us. That is pathetic. It prevents us from seeing the basic goodness.

    Chögyam Trungpa, “Basic goodness”, in True perception: the path of dharma art.


    Kek_szokemasfelmazsa_zsoltsutofoto_02

    Photo: Zsolt Sütő

    • Tweet
  • Imagem de perfil / Profile image:
    © Andy Karr

    Todos os direitos reservados
    All rights reserved

    Dharma/Arte
    www.dharma.art.br
    contato@dharma.art.br

    214070 Visualizações/Views
  • Arquivo/Archive

    • 2011 (151)
      • April (4)
      • March (64)
      • February (44)
      • January (39)
    • 2010 (441)
      • December (44)
      • November (53)
      • October (60)
      • September (78)
      • August (68)
      • July (68)
      • June (70)

    RSS

    Subscribe to this posterous
    Unsubscribe
    Assine/Subscribe
    You're a contributor here (Edit)
    This is your Space (Edit)
    Follow by email »
    Get the latest updates in your email box automatically.
  • Membros / Members

    • Seja um membro apoiador
    • Become a sustaining member

    Informativo / Newsletter

    • Assine
    • Subscribe